So how well does the original Guardians of the Galaxy movie hold up after all this time? Or, alternatively, after just a couple of
weeks? After a fourth, third, or even
second viewing?
If I had to be a little presumptuous (at least
more than usual), I’d bet that most of the big heads of companies in the
entertainment industry thrive on getting as many customers to buy in as early
as possible. You see it all the time
with video games, and considering that movies only have so long for their
theatrical releases -- not counting trips to DVDs, Blu-Rays, and all sorts of
streaming services -- I’d assume they work on the same principle. Get ‘em on the hook early so that they can
enjoy “the thing” now, and pay for
“the thing” now. Time is money.
It’s safe to say that the first
Guardians got people on the hook and
brought in the cash sooner rather than later.
I’ll go ahead and assume that’s the case for
Vol. 2…
even though I
don’t really have to, but whatever. Plus,
the beauty of movies is that instead of replay value after an initial
playthrough, people that want to experience it again have no choice but to buy
another ticket and fill up theater seats.
But the bigger question is whether or not this movie, or its
predecessor, or its brothers in Marvel arms have legs. Are the MCU offerings good just because of
the immediate thrills they provide? What
happens when the thrills wear off? Will
they
still be good in the future?
Probably, yeah.
And my reasoning for that can be explained with…rakes.
OIL BOMB! BEAR
TRAP! BEAR TRAP! THIS WEIGHS MORE THAN ME!
INCOMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIING!
(spoilers)
I’LL KILL YOU, YOU SON OF AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA--!