See that? Michael Bay isn’t the only one that can
sanction awkwardly-phrased subtitles.
…And now you know
exactly how I reacted after seeing the end of Transformers: Dark of the Moon.
So let me start again
by saying this. FUCK EVERYTHING. WHY WAS THIS MOVIE EVER MADE? WHY DID PEOPLE ALLOW THIS TO BE MADE? WHY WOULD PEOPLE WANT TO MAKE THIS MOVIE
(besides money)? WHY MUST THEY BECKON MY
HATRED? HATE! HATE! HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATE!
…And now you know
exactly how I still feel.
So let me start once
more by saying this. My brother just
happened to be scrolling through Netflix as I walked into the room, and he was
looking for a movie to watch. He passed
up a few on his way through the menus, like The
Dictator, The Grey, and Thor, but
he didn’t seem to have too much of an interest in any of them at the
moment. And then he saw the cover of a
certain robot-filled movie, and looked over to me. “Which one is this one again?”
“What, Dark of the Moon? That’s the second -- no, wait, it’s the third one.”
He didn’t say another
word. He just hit Play and started
watching.
I got up in an
instant. “I’m out.”
And I started walking
away. But he called me back in -- said
to give it at least five minutes. So I
grabbed a pillow and took a seat on the floor, and decided I’d give it more
than just five minutes. I’ve poked fun
of Michael Bay and the Transformers movies
before, but truth be told the only one I’d ever seen -- on TV, of course -- is
the first one. It wasn’t all that great,
but I can think of worse ways to spend my time. The only bits of Revenge of the Fallen I’ve seen are the clips Film Brain used in
his video review, and I find myself thankful I was spared of the pain a
thousand other movie fans have had dealt upon their hearts.
So I suppose I had to
give the movie a fair shake. I couldn’t
make fun of a movie I’d never seen before.
Nor could I analyze what went wrong for myself. If I wanted to see what Michael Bay hath
wrought, I had to steel myself, take a seat, and give the movie a look. My expectations were low going in. They couldn’t possibly go any lower than
zero.
Guess what? This movie is worse than zero. In fact, it is now the WORST movie I have
ever seen. The WORST. By a huge margin.
Is there even any point
in me doing a post on this movie? It’s
been out for, what, two years? Do I even
need to tell you how bad it is? Do I
need to type a single goddamn word? Do I
really? What can I say that could
possibly change anyone’s opinion on this multi-million dollar piece of garbage?
…Breathe in, breathe
out. Breathe in, breathe out. Breathe in, breathe out.
Okay. Let me start this thing one more time. I want you to understand something, if
nothing else. I’ve said before that I
don’t like terrible things, because they have the nasty habit of giving me a
supremely bad headache. It happened with
Percy Jackson, and it happened
here. But this time, there was even more
to it. I don’t know if it was just
because I did so much yawning, or because I stared at an alternating mix of a
hyper-saturated orange-blue palette and barely-comprehensible gunmetal carnage,
but I noticed that before the movie was done, my eyes were watering. I think at certain points, I was about to
start crying. And when the movie ended,
after some two and a half hours of vacuous nonsense, I felt sick. Sick, and tired, and barely able to move my
legs. As soon as the words “directed by
Michael Bay” flashed on the screen, I sauntered off and didn’t look back --
even after catching a glimpse of an epilogue from the corner of my eye. If I had stayed any longer, there’s a chance
I might have shut down completely…or worse.
Dark of the Moon. Where do I
even begin?
That’ll do.
1) Sam Witwicky.
This is one of my
ironclad rules, and I’m going to keep repeating it for as long as I live: you can’t have a good story without a good
main character. No exceptions. No objections. No room for appeal. If you can’t make a compelling lead, don’t
even bother trying to win my favor.
And at the outset, DotM looked ready to try and offer up
something substantial. Perennial sore
point Sam Witwicky (played by LaBeouf, as always) doesn’t appear at the start
of the movie. Instead, we’re treated to
a lengthy flashback to the past, showing the process of the lunar landing --
and with it, the truth behind the expedition.
Apparently, the war on Cybertron led to some ancient device -- or the
components of one, at least -- getting lost in the midst of a battle, and sent
hurtling toward Earth (which I suspect is not the first thing that’s happened
in this series, but whatever). Collected
in one site on the Ark, which in itself is lodged in the dark side of the moon,
the U.S. and Russia launched their space campaigns in order to lay claim to it,
or at the very least harness its secrets for themselves.
The opening is easily
the best part of the movie, even though its brief glimpse of Cybertron is about
as clear as watching a few million quarters tumble around in a dryer. Unfortunately, you can pinpoint the exact
moment where the movie takes a four-hundred MPH nosedive -- a half-second after
the title card appears, and the pants-bereft ass of Sam’s new girlfriend Carly
takes up the better part of the screen.
(I’m pretty sure at that point I trotted out the phrase “This is gonna
be a long movie” in my head -- and
that’s never a good sign.) And then we
get to Sam himself…and the real problems begin.
I’ve heard the argument
that in order for people to get invested in a story, they need to have a human
character. Not just a surrogate
character -- 100% human. That’s not
exactly a requirement for every story, obviously (at least a half-dozen Pixar
movies say hi), but I can see the pont they’re trying to make. The audience needs a relatable
character. They need someone to latch on
to -- someone basic, someone understandable, and someone who can be the anchor
to normality, even in the midst of the zaniness bound to happen before
them. From what I’ve seen of The Sorcerer’s Apprentice -- at least as much as I could take before
clocking out and realizing it was a waste of time -- it was “necessary” to have
a regular human character pulled out of his element as he stood alongside
Magical Nicolas Cage. Now, if it were up
to my I would take out the titular apprentice and make the movie all about
Magical Nicolas Cage, but what do I know?
I’d probably do something crazy like not
include a squealing yellow-bellied doofus and focus on the actual struggle
between supreme magical forces. The mere
idea is pure…well…
Joking aside, what’s
important is that whatever character you put on-screen, and whatever character
you want the audience to “follow”, they’d better be worth following. Do they have to be human, and only human? No. Do
they have to be well-versed in the nature of their absurd universe, or some
kind of seasoned veteran? No. But here’s the thing: your character doesn’t
have to BE human, but they have to FEEL human.
Charismatic. Compelling. Complex.
Something. Anything. Give the character a spark, and you can prove
that they’re human enough.
With all that said, how
does Sam fare in this movie? It’s obvious.
Somehow, someway, Sam manages to be less human than the thirty-foot
robots waging war all around him. No,
it’s worse than that -- Sam is less realistic than the CG used to render the
thirty-foot robots waging war all around him.
This character is
completely awful. Unbelievably
awful. He’s aggressively self-centered,
short-sighted, ungrateful, domineering, self-aggrandizing, and thinks he’s entitled
to whatever and whoever he wants just because he “saved the world”, and I
guaran-damn-tee you there aren’t quotation marks big enough for that. This is a character that LITERALLY has a
supermodel-class girlfriend wrapping herself around him in every other scene,
and he treats her like a disease-riddled maid -- at least until the thrust of
his “character arc” forces him to realize “Gee, I guess I shouldn’t take my
girlfriend for granted! Tee hee!” All he ever does is whine, gloat about past
victories that aren’t even his, and demands everything and everyone conform to
his rules, his standards, and his whims.
The Autobots are being used in military operations around the world, and
Sam is angry at them because “they’re not there when he calls them” or “they’re
getting to do stuff while he sits around getting ignored.” Sam, the day you spontaneously quintuple in
size and gain the ability to fire surface-to-air missiles from your shoulders
is the day the government will be running up to you and begging for help; until
that day comes, stop being such a
cantankerous, pus-spewing asshole.
Oh, but he’ll try. And the movie tries, so very hard, to prove
to us that Sam is worth having around.
For some inexplicable reason, Sam is obsessed with trying to get back
into the action -- even though I would have figured that given the events of
the first (and presumably the second) movie, he would have preferred a quiet
life where he wasn’t in danger of getting blown apart every fifteen
seconds. Alas, ‘twas not meant to
be. Only Sam has the information that
everyone needs! (He doesn’t.) Only Sam can infiltrate the ranks of friends
and enemies, men and machines alike! (He
can’t.) Only Sam should lead the
military troop in an attempt to thwart the plans of the Decepticons, and only
Sam should wield the Autobot prototype weapons that really should have been
passed around a lot sooner than an hour before the battle to save the
planet! (He shouldn’t, and he definitely shouldn’t.) He’s an unwelcome presence throughout this
entire movie; he’s supremely annoying from start to finish, to the point where even
after he saves his girlfriend from the Decepticons -- because of course she
gets held hostage -- I doubt he’s learned a single lesson. If he shows up in Transformers 4, I would assume that his character development, such
as it is, will go straight back its starting point somewhere near the lower end
of negative infinity.
I’d almost call it
deviously brilliant. Maybe the entire
concept of Sam is supposed to be a bit of a subversive injection; that is, he’s
our surrogate character, but he’s making fun of everything the movie and its
audience is supposed to stand for. Hey,
kids! Want to be a hero and pal around
with the Autobots? Too bad! You may think you’re a badass with the right
to hang out with Optimus Prime, but in reality you’re a needy, obsessive creep
who treats everything and everyone around him like the salt of the earth in
your quest to run alongside the militant mech-warriors screaming your head off
and needing to be saved!
And you know what? I think I would have preferred that. If they had gone all the way -- if Optimus
walked up to Sam and told him to piss off, that would have been awesome.
But he didn’t. Sam Witwicky is supposed to be the guy we’re
rooting for. He’s supposed to be the
do-no-wrong, put-upon “hero”, whose struggle isn’t born out f necessity, but
conceit on his part and contrivance on the writers’ part. Well, contrivance and contempt for the
audience. Sam is only in this movie for
vicarious, proxy-based insertion into the action; he’s a ringing endorsement of
the idea that you’re allowed to be an asshole as long as you run around telling
everyone you’re a hero, because it’s everyone else’s fault for getting in your
way.
I would list some more
concrete examples, but I’d be typing until next year if I started doing
that. So I’ll just leave you with this
little nugget: when he’s being grilled by government officials in a room lined
with awards, plaques, and medals, Sam says that he has one medal and treats it like a bigger deal than everything else in
the room, including the hardened agent standing a yard away.
I’m not sure I want to
live in a universe that houses a movie like this.
2) The robots.
Why do the robots have
accents?
This was a question I
had to ask myself, and my brother, and the movie, multiple times, and I never
got a good answer. Why do the robots have accents? Indulge me for a moment here. The Autobots and Decepticons are supposed to
be from Cybertron, an alien world light-years away from Earth. Obviously, they would have their own language
-- especially given that they have their own alien writing. Maybe they have a different sentence
structure, or lexicon, or communicate in beeps and boops. If that’s the case, why do they have accents
that line up with Earth-based accents?
Okay, sure, so they downloaded other languages into their databanks or
whatever, but what was the point of downloading accents? Huge percentages of the action --
particularly in this movie -- take place in the U.S., so what’s the point?
There’s an Autobot in
this movie that’s got some kind of Scottish accent, but if he’s in the U.S.,
then why would he speak like that? Even
if we work under the assumption that the Autobot awoke in Scotland and altered
his language processors to match the surroundings, why wouldn’t he change to
American English once he started working for the government? Wouldn’t he want to be more easily accepted
by his American peers? Even beyond that,
for what reason does a race of robots even need
accents? They’re robots. Machines.
Designed to operate efficiently without cultural barriers getting in the
way. So why bother with accents? Do they even understand the concept of accents?
Now, I will be
fair. There is one reason that the movie
offers as to why they have accents. You
see, if these machines -- Autobots, Decepticons, or otherwise -- didn’t speak
in different voices, most of them wouldn’t have characters. Or be distinguishable from one another.
The robots -- yes, even
Optimus -- don’t even threaten to be good at any point throughout this
movie. I defy you to name every single
transformer that appears in this movie, and I defy you to consistently keep up
with who’s who at any given point. The
only ones you can do that with are Optimus, Bumblebee, and Sentinel Prime, and
that’s because they’re colored differently…or at the very least, colored at
all. All the Decepticons are gray and
black snarling monsters (at least when they aren’t being tiny hyper-obnoxious
cretins). I managed to hear “Ironhide”
amidst the cacophony of bad writing and my own tear-laden cries, but I couldn’t
pick him out in a scene if you asked me.
There are two other robots called “the Wreckers”, but damned if I know
who they are and what they contribute to the plot. I would say that these machines are only in
the movie to facilitate explosions and pretenses of a plot, but like many, many
others have said before me, they’re utterly marginalized in their own
film. And I think I know why.
If you’ve been on my
blog before, you may have seen some of the “art” I’ve thrown up every now and
then. This is one of the more common
ones:
And not too long ago, I
decided to retire it. And I replaced it
with an updated version:
I admit I’m not much in
the way of art. I do a so-so job, but
it’s definitely not my forte -- so to compensate, I try to make things as easy
on myself as I can. Drawing things in
Paint can be much more complicated and time-consuming than you (and I) would
have guessed, but certain approaches and techniques can make things
simpler. For a non-artist, art is
hard…and I’d bet that even for those who DO have some real skill, making art
takes time, effort, and of course skill.
I’ll come back to this topic another day with evidence, but for now I’ll
just say this: simplicity is key. Excess
breeds waste, and waste breeds dissatisfaction.
Even for this movie, they -- the animators, and likely the writers by
extension -- tried to get past it with some shortcuts of their own. What am I getting at here? Well, it’s simple.
They made the
transformers too damn complicated to render for their own good. So rather than painstakingly animating them
every step of the way, they just decided to remove them whenever they could.
That’s the only
explanation for why these movies focus on the humans instead of the
transformers. Or if not that, then at
least the reason I want to believe; I REFUSE to accept that this is the story
of Sam’s plight as his Victoria’s Secret girlfriend tries to bend herself into
his new belt. Every single transformer
in this movie is a mess of metal shards and doodads, shifting and squirming
like a parent jingling his keys in front of a baby. There’s too much information that a viewer
has to process, and too much information for even the average supercomputer to
render. So the only way to keep the
budget under a trillion dollars -- you know, besides doing the smart thing and
making the robot designs simpler -- is to keep them off-screen for as much time
as an undiscerning audience member can tolerate without calling BS. The tradeoff is that these robots, Autobots
or Decepticons, aren’t even one-note; it’s more like they’re a quarter-note,
maybe even eighth. Bumblebee is Sam’s
friend. Megatron is the bad guy. Starscream is also a bad guy. Wheelie makes me want to ram a carving knife
through my shin. Optimus is noble…except
when he decides to go on killing sprees.
Sentinel Prime is a good guy who turns evil because reasons. There are other robots.
That’s it. That’s all there is to the robots in this
movie. Most of them don’t even get
named; the only reason I knew Wheelie’s name was because of MovieBob. The transformers are marginalized in a movie
titled Transformers. Let that sink in. If you’ve seen this movie, you know what I’m
talking about, and you can agree with me.
If you haven’t seen this movie, then let me confirm that the hearsay is
100% accurate. They get no time to be
anything more than graphics and explosion generators. And yet, somehow, someway, they manage to be
better characters than the humans.
Let me rephrase
that. Somehow, someway, the robots
manage to be more human than the humans.
3) Everyone else.
There’s no denying that
Sam is the biggest asshole in the entire movie, but the humans are only a few
steps below him on the “I Want to be Around These People” scale. Who among them deserves the award for best
character? Take your pick. You’ve got the smarmy boss guy who turns out
to be a traitor to the human race.
There’s a slew of government officials/agents that are varying degrees
of jerkiness. Sam’s parents are still
kicking around and being awkward, which therefore must immediately mean they’re
comedy gold. We can’t forget about the
random extra strutting around the office “violating the dress code” because
it’s been too long since there have been boobs on the screen. And of course, there’s the unsinkable Deep
Wang. Can’t leave him off the billing.
Now here’s a question I
have about Sam’s girlfriend Carly (who’s apparently named after a character
from the cartoon, but if you don’t know that -- like me during the film’s run
time -- then you’re probably laughing at the fact that there’s a character named
CARly running around). Given what I’ve
said about Sam, and given what the audience knows about Sam by watching the
movie, there’s a question that never gets a good answer: what
the hell does she see in him? This
guy displays open contempt for her and others throughout the entire movie. The thrust of the plot is thanks to him being
such an uncompromising tool, forcing her into the arms of his love rival, her
ex, and inevitably leading to her being kidnapped and held for ransom. And at the end of the movie, they hug and
kiss, because that’s just what people do at the end of movies. So what, was the lovers’ spat they had before
her kidnapping erased? Did she forget
about the constant bullshit he made her (and us) sit through?
It doesn’t make any
sense. It doesn’t make their bond
deeper, it just makes her even less of a character -- and need I remind you
that we were introduced to this character via a gargantuan ass shot. The only thing she’s there for is to be arm
candy and something to look at besides hyper-saturated oranges and blues and
incomprehensible robot parts. You can’t
do that -- not in a movie with a nine-figure budget made in the present
day. You can’t throw up a character with
the sole purpose of wearing tight dresses and being Shia LaBeouf’s hula
hoop. You can’t make her a damsel in
distress for one half of the movie and a symbol of male status in the
other. You. Can’t.
DO IT.
…You know what? I think I can actually name the best
character in this movie. It’s Buzz
Aldrin.
I’m out of here. I’ll finish this up next time; if I don’t do
something that doesn’t make me want to stick my head in a vise, chances are
I’ll stick my head in a vise. So “look
forward to” the next post, wherein I try to figure out the plot. If there is one.
*sigh* Good job, Mr.
Aldrin. Good job.
Let me say one thing about Revenge of the Fallen: I fell asleep. It sucked THAT bad. You missed nothing... except the robot's balls on the pyramid. That was memorable (for the wrong reasons).
ReplyDeleteNever seen Dark of the Moon (a HORRENDOUS title, BTW) and never plan to. Michael Bay sucks, the people involved suck, everything about this movie "franchise" sucks.
Transformers fans don't deserve this.
"I fell asleep. It sucked THAT bad."
ReplyDeleteCripes a la mode, it must have been. I would have figured that with all the explosions going off, it'd be impossible to fall asleep. Then again, if RotF ALSO has an hour-plus sequence of Sam's wacky misadventures, maybe it's not quite so far-fetched. Also, I haven't seen the movie, but I get the feeling I know exactly what made the pyramid battle so memorable. And it's an inclusion like that that just makes me go "Why?"
The answer to that, I'd wager, is "Because they can." Now if you'll excuse me, I think I have to go cry for the next eight hours.
Well, when I was younger, I used to listen to some loud rock and metal music to help me sleep. So I guess I'm an anomaly.
ReplyDeleteWorse. ROTF has as insulting pair of robots acting like stereotypical urban black people... only worse. Even the stereotype of the stereotype would feel outraged at the whole "Readin'?" "We don't do much readin'!" "Yo, yo, yo!" crap. And don't get me started on the one Decepticon droid dry-humping Megan Fox's leg.
Everything else was a blur. Or maybe everything I said was a dream... I don't remember... the movie bored me to tears... zzzzzz... z_z
...Guy, you wanna take this one?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nf-ANnjvrlA
Ah, yes, that'll do. Now then, back to crying.
Yeah, Wall-E was the EXACT movie/character I had in mind when I wrote that line. There are others, no question, but that little robot came to mind first and spoke (relatively speaking) the loudest. Ah, Pixar. Would that all movie makers could follow your example and not make shit.
ReplyDeleteIn any case, I can buy your theory on the transformers' accents. I've dumped pretty much everything about the first movie from my brain -- for obvious reasons -- but I suppose I can't deny that if it's a means to appeal to human sensibilities (and that they pooled their dialogue from certain locations), then that's okay. Except, you know, when the accents and voices become less of a trait or a means to expand on human/transformer relations and more of an annoyance that makes my ears wail in agony. I have no idea why they had to put Wheelie in that movie, but I would very much like for all evidence of him -- and these movies at large -- to be erased.
I'm just glad I never saw the second movie. I don't think my soul could handle the "fabled" Skids and Mudflap.
"I’ve heard the argument that in order for people to get invested in a story, they need to have a human character." Wall-E would like to have a word with you naysayers.
ReplyDeleteAnyway. I can probably justify the robot accents without watching this crappy movie. In the first movie they mention that the Autobots learned to talk from Media broadcasts made by humans. You can easily justify that they got their accents based around what they chose to pool their dialogue from.
Plus robot logic could discern diversity amongst humans, these details were much more important to the Autobots than the Decepticons, but they could find similar uses. If their intent was instilling terror in organics they might intentionally pool their speech from scary stuff. In that train of thought it might be fun to have one not talk at all but emit noises akin to nails on a chalkboard.
But you know what? Michael Bay. So that wasn't thought of, go figure.