January 23, 2020

Her Name is Rio…Wait, No it Isn’t

Well, it’s been a while since I’ve done any ranting and rambling about my writing stuff.  I mean, given how many times I’ve griped about the works of others, it’s only natural that I invite scorn upon my meager, feeble soul by pulling the curtain back on what I’ve been working on.  The central premise, on some level, has always been “test myself by testing others”, but doing the reverse is more than valuable.

Ideally, this blog wouldn’t be the platform to do it.  Here’s the thing, though: there were, at one point, plans to hop on TV Tropes’ forums (for the first time in a while) and try and court feedback there.  As a character-focused writer angling for praise from a character-focused society, it would’ve served me well to have others weigh in on the leading lady I’ve been cooking up for the past ten months.  Thing is, there was a problem: I didn’t know her name.

I’ve failed you, Duran Duran…the Funko Pops of which are seeing a surge in popularity, for some reason.



Okay, making catchy songs are a good reason.

Let me back up for a minute, though.  It’s not like I’ve been losing sleep for nearly a year now, sitting here in my chair night after night with eyes bloodshot as I try to come up with a character’s name.  I’ve had a name for a while.  More to the point, because I had that name, I was able to come up with the words to support her story.  Last I checked, the word count was somewhere around 126,000.  That’s before major editing (i.e. moving to the second draft), so there’s a TON that’ll have to get cut or sanded down.  Then again, there’s an argument to be made that I’m already on the second draft -- and I’ll explain why in a bit.  For now, though?  Names.

Had I gone with the intent and vision from waaaaaaaaaaaaay before I started this blog, she would have gone by “Mel”.  She also would have been a curiously tall wannabe knight in a world of swords and sorcery, but oh well.  People change, the world changes, and stories are only set in stone when they’re in the hands of would-be readers.  You can’t begin to fathom how many iterations it’s taken to get to this point (least of all because I don’t even know myself -- not even going to try and ballpark it).  What matters is that I’ve reached a stage where I’m a few chapters away from finishing this new work.  By which I mean I only have one 100% new chapter to write immediately, multiple chapters I can pull from a previous version and jury-rig into this version, a second 100% new chapter that I wager will be a smooth one to write, and after that it’s more jury-rigging until I can slap a THE END into my manuscript.

So ends the tale of Julie Ann…or something.  I mean, the tale’s not done, but close to it -- so close that I’ve almost entirely visualized how things will play out down to the final page.  Also, her name’s not Julie Ann anymore.  Therein lies the problem.


The target word count is 100K words or below.  And with me being me, it’s challenging to keep that count from being irredeemably bloated.  I mean, granted, I’ve done the exact same thing before, but this time I’m preemptively sanding down and making changes before the big rework.  That means if there’s a way to shave words, I’ll shave them.  In this instance?  “Julie Ann” counts as two words, not one -- so doing a little find-and-replace immediately gave me a decent-sized cut to the count.  Which is good! 

The problem is that I’ve had that name in mind for over ten months, and doing such a massive pivot like renaming the main character is akin to making a bullet train do a 330-degree turn.  I’m at a point right now where, even if I’m mentally working through ideas and moments, I reflexively call her Julie Ann.  The temptation to drop the name change is persistent and virulent.


The thing about me is that there’s an absurd level of granularity to my “process”.  Most of the stuff I’m concerned with is probably going to be a trifle, least of all because right now I’m not working in a medium with an audiovisual component -- and thus, those little tidbits aren’t going to matter to people whose minds will fill in the blanks.  But it matters to me.  Immensely.  Every detail has to be covered, explored, and answered as needed. 

Hair color.  Eye color.  Skin tone.  Height.  Weight.  Body type.  Outfit.  Personality.  Interests.  Hobbies.  Poise.  Tics.  Habits.  Dialect.  Favorite phrases.  And then you get into the nuances of what really matters: her personality.  Is she introverted or extroverted?  Is she passive, assertive, or aggressive?  Kind, neutral, or mean?  How does she respond to stress?  To conflict?  What effect has the past had on her?  What effect does the present have on her?  There’s so much to consider, all the time, every time.  And what’s been kicking my ass over the past couple of months is that each time there’s a name change -- one pulled from a lengthy, multi-columned list -- all of those details end up getting reset.

There’s a reason why these days, Faust is my spirit animal.


It feels like the final great challenge before hitting a writing milestone (or another one, at least, what with me having an entirely different, finished manuscript sitting on my left as I type this) is, incidentally, the first: answering the question of who this character is.  Maybe this is something that I deserve; after all, this story I’m working on now is one that’s eluded full conceptualization for most of the past three years.  Notably, it’s the question that I’ve been posing here on this very blog for the better part of a decade: how do you make a good story starring a giant woman?

I’ve posited before that it’s possible, and the only reason people haven’t up to this point is because A) they aren’t taking the concept seriously, B) they’re convinced it’s only for fetish fuel, and C) they’re too scurred to give it an honest go.  My unchecked insanity makes me immune to all of those ostensibly-reasonable concerns, which is why I’m a hair’s breadth away from pushing out the narrative I’ve pushed for ages -- the fabled “kaiju-sized single mom” I’ve mentioned in passing, give or take mentions of her wrestling prowess.  It’s fertile ground incarnate.  To my knowledge and many Google searches (some more shameful than others), there’s been so little exploration of the concept that the number of novels that even approaches it meaningfully can be counted on one hand.  Depending on how you slice it?  On one finger.


I’m pretty much standing alone on this frontier, meaning that I’m free to cultivate the land -- which may or may not be on fire or filled with scorpions…which are also on fire -- as I see fit.  As a reminder, the core qualifiers are “is female”, “is the main character”, and “is huge”.  Basic, yes, but it’s the exploration and execution of concepts/qualifiers that sets the real shit apart from the disposable B-movie chaff.  Thus, here we have “Julie Ann” to answer the question -- to say “then this would happen” vis a vis the what-if scenario I’ve provided.  Like I’ve said in a previous post, if we follow the idea of a giant woman living in modern society (albeit one with a curiously 80s-themed aesthetic) to its logical conclusion, then her life would be an unmitigated disaster 24/7. 

And I’m not shying away from that.  Others might, stripping their stories of an honest exploration of the circumstances and consequences.  (Then again, it might dampen the “fantasy” aspect if creators/fans had to worry about the death toll from a giantess’ Sunday stroll.)  But I’m not.  In my eyes, that’s how you get drama.  Comedy, too, if you can believe it.  Events bound to leave an impression.  There’s conflict even before the villains show up -- but because there are villains, the conflict gets forced upward and the action beats stamped onto more than a couple of pages.  Because I’m me, and I’ll be damned if there’s not a wrestling match with a giant robot.


But this a post about a character, and a story about that character.  Every question I ask in the story has to be answered by the heroine through her words, thoughts, actions, and beliefs.  The thing is, there are multiple answers to the questions -- right down to her very nature as a person.  It’s to the point where the version I’m working on is the second, with the first having been scrapped (save for parts I can salvage) because it ventured down an entirely different path.  One that, despite the promise, I didn’t want to take.

Back then, the heroine was unequivocally named Julie Ann.  And back then, being a giant woman sucked even more than you’d expect.  Having been enormous for as long as she could remember -- she was 7’6” when she was eight! -- Julie Ann suffered a huge amount of mental and emotional trauma.  Harassment, scorn, disdain, exclusion, isolation, hate; she had to bear it all with a smile.  Was she strong enough to crack skulls?  Absolutely, and her size and strength only increased over the years (and rapidly, over the course of the original story).  But she’s the only one of her kind, a proverbial guest among society.  A Goliath among Davids.  If she lashes out, it’s game over for her; she’ll get ostracized by society even more than she already has.  Despite her stature, she’s got no choice but to be a good little girl.

Because of that, in the original version Julie Ann ended up getting saddled with a slew of mental illnesses and disorders.  We’re talking crippling social anxiety -- so much so that she starts the story in an oversized jail cell, and would rather stay there forever than live in the real world by virtue of her five-year sentence expiring.  Anxious, timid, and virtually unable to function in society; her character arc would have forced her to stand tall as, for circumstances yet unknown to her, she progressively stood taller.

Thing is, there was a problem.  And it’s got nothing to do with her name, if you can believe it.


The way things were going, Julie Ann was going to be too “innocent” to be the protagonist in this instance.  Too skewed towards being a woobie, and thus dampening the story’s impact.  I needed a heroine whose circumstances welcomed sympathy, yes, but also someone who was more than just someone to feel sorry for.  I wanted a character with faults.  With failings.  With a history.  Someone whose actions, good and bad, construct the plot around her.  By story’s end, it should be irrefutably obvious that the heroine is exactly that…but it should also be clear that the problems introduced are, in plenty of instances, her own creations.  Self-inflicted wounds that, at the risk of spoiling a novel far from being published, lead straight to a BAD END.

I needed a braver character.  A bolder character.  Stalwart, but also spirited, and silly on more than one occasion.  So I started over, and…incidentally, didn’t rename her.  She was still Julie Ann for a good while, largely because she’s a southern girl who’s long since transplanted into a pseudo-Los Angeles.  That detail is set in stone.  Plenty of others aren’t. 


I needed a name that played to the character’s southern roots.  Something that has a cute flair, but not so cute that it makes her seem infantile (she’s 33, after all).  Something that has meaning without clubbing the reader over the head with symbolism.  Something that reflects her beauty, yet not so much that it sounds “divine”, for lack of a better word.  Something down-to-earth.  Something feminine.  Something at least a little boyish, if possible.  Something that isn’t exactly used every day.  Something feasibly used in the modern day. 

And then you get down to all these arbitrary rules that my Gordian knot of a brain refuses to reconcile.  “No two characters can have a name that starts with the same letter, unless they’re related.”  “The main heroine can’t have a name that ends with an A, because her foil/villain in the works has a non-negotiable name that ends with an A.” “Names used repeatedly throughout a story can only have two syllables.”  “The name should rhythmically flow in a sentence.”  “The name should end with an E sound, if possible…no, wait, never mind, you do that with a ton of your female characters…well, actually, it’s fine, though…wait, it’s not fine…to be fair…”  And so on, and so forth.  In some instances, her name change made me (briefly) change the names of other characters -- which, as you can guess, made the struggle realer than real.  And also made me want to jam a carving knife into one of my lobes.


Like I said, the name changes triggered the chance (at a bare minimum) to redo key aspects of the heroine.  As in, I’ve gone back and forth dozens of times over whether to make her blonde or give her burgundy hair.  I’m ultimately settling on blonde because that’s basically my thing now it fits the image/affect/aesthetic I have in mind, but the appeal of another hair color is eternal.  Because I’m me, though, there have been instances where a different name made me think “Wait, I can’t make her blonde if she has that name.  Damn it, time for another visual overhaul.”  So began another instance where I’d have to redo her entire color scheme…which is a problem when the novel as a whole has a purposely-enforced color scheme. 

It begs the question of how much a name can impact a person.  In the real world, it probably doesn’t matter what someone’s name is (unless it’s a real stinker), because their nature and upbringing shine far brighter.  In the world of fiction, though?  The rules are bent for the sake of purposeful creation -- which is to say that the creator’s control gives meaning and impact.  There’s a reason they’re called “Jedi”, after all.


So here’s a list of names that actually -- however briefly -- made it into the manuscript, along with others in the running...bearing in mind that outside of a couple, her surname would always be “Haywood”:

Jenna --the OG name following the reboot.  Full of vim and vigor, and starts with J to boot…buuuuuuuuuuuut it sounds a little too young for an adult heroine.
Margaret “Maggie” Mackenzie -- props to The Walking Dead for this one.  Same as the above, with the first two letters of both names coming together to form “Mama”.  Rejected all the same, though.
Josephine (AKA “Josie”) -- notably, this name means “God shall increase”; fitting, because the heroine’s growing at a monstrous rate.  Full name or nickname, though, it doesn’t carry the right feel.
Flora -- the heroine loves flowers, so this one’s a serious contender by default.  The problem?  It ends with an A, and moreover, it kind of makes her sound like an old woman, doesn’t it?
Meryl -- came close to using this one, because it apparently means “bright sea” (which becomes relevant later).  Is it a common enough name with enough southern flair?  Probably, but the feel isn’t quite right…


Fiora -- another close contender, because ironically, it means “little flower”.  A little too rare and sophisticated, though…
Leanne -- definitely carries with it that southern affect.  It’s solid, for sure, but I had a feeling I could do better…and did, eventually.
Charlotte (AKA “Charlie”) -- I was SO CLOSE to using this one.  So VERY CLOSE.  Pretty, but the nickname variant has a spunky flair to it.  The conversation would have ended right there, had it not been for the fact that her son’s name is Chase -- and me being me, I wouldn’t dare give two characters the same three letters in their first name, let alone one.
Hannah Hayes -- this one’s the real shot in the dark.  It’s the fusion of Daryl Hannah and Alison Hayes, the two actresses who, fittingly, both played 50-foot women.  Given that my heroine wants to be an actress, it was a strong contender…but it ends in an A sound, if not the letter, and, well, you know how I do.

I’ll be real: I have no idea if this is going to pay off.  Historical precedents suggest that it won’t, and it’ll be back to the drawing board to fumble around, scurrying about to figure out where I went wrong.  But I’d like to think that this is the one, based on both the premise and the execution.  A character with unparalleled destructive power and a gentle heart; with high hopes for the city around (and below) her, coupled with her take on the story’s overarching theme of delusional dreams.  A hero who fights for good, but whose mere presence in town makes her a top-ranking villain.


They say the devil’s in the details, and I believe it.  The granularity of each facet and change, of all these variables that make a character a character -- it’s staggering.  Mind-numbingly so.  I’ve drawn this character more than any other since mid-2016, and I’ve scrapped plenty of those drawings because I couldn’t decide on just the perfect styling of her hair.  Think about how much can change in a novel, where people are depending on me for a cohesive, satisfying start, middle, and end.  It’s not gonna be easy.

But I think it’ll work out this time. 

Her name is Rosie.  And when she shines, she really shows you all she can.




No comments:

Post a Comment