All right. Now let’s talk about The Simpsons for a bit.
Like I said before --
maybe against my better judgment -- I’m one of those terrible creatures that
still think The Simpsons is still
funny. It’s not the funniest show ever,
mind you, and not always on-point; I’ll go ahead and mirror the sentiment that
the show in recent seasons is at its worst when it goes on at length about
modern technology (because those things and their usage tend to make fun of
themselves). But for what it’s worth,
when it’s on I’ll gladly watch it.
Still, there’s one
thing that I want to bring up. I think The Simpsons is still funny, but
sometimes I don’t feel like people are thinking about the show’s quality in the
right way. I don’t think people should
be asking if it’s still funny; they should be asking if it still has heart. I’m
not implying that its crew is phoning it in -- especially in comparison to certain other shows -- but I wonder if
they’re putting the effort in the right places.
Getting in those jokes is simple enough, and expected of the crew, but
if the Nostalgia Critic’s Top 11 list taught me anything, it’s that The Simpsons can and has handled more
than just gags, slapstick, and the occasional bit of social commentary.
Ah, if only Family Guy could learn such valuable
lessons…
Springfield is a realm
of fantasy, but the people in it have struggles and problems that make them
human. Identifiable. Understandable. Relatable.
Bart’s in danger of repeating a grade.
Lisa falls in and out of love (and breaks hearts along the way). Marge’s façade of a perfect, smiling
homemaker is constantly being challenged from within and without. There’s a theory that Homer
is the embodiment of nihilism.
There’s heavier stuff in the show than just catch phrases and trombopolines -- and in a
lot of ways, it makes for a better show.
Then again, even in
recent years The Simpsons has proven
that it can take on gravitas, even if it’s in the show’s signature -- i.e.
flippant -- style. Lisa’s learned the
hard way that in spite of her intelligence, she’s still an eight-year-old girl
with much to learn about family (Homer’s constant betrayals), fear (all the
science in the world can’t save her from monsters), and even death (Bluella her
story end exactly how you’d expect a beached whale’s story to end). In an almost meta play on the canon and the
status quo, Bart is effectively doomed to have every relationship he’s ever
been in collapse thanks to his inevitable screw-ups. Marge is becoming more and more aware of the
holes in her marriage and her life, with her fights getting longer and longer,
and Homer having to work harder and harder to patch things up. By and large, Homer is still Homer -- for
good and for ill.
Obviously, I still have
faith in the show. Part of it may be
because I’m too stubborn to admit that a show I’ve been watching for as long as
I can remember might -- might have
gotten slightly worse over the years.
That’s very possible. But even
with both its evolution and stumbles in mind -- with the changing of the guard
and the loss of the series’ greatest champions -- there’s an inherent nature to
the show that makes it worthwhile, even after all these years. For all the mistakes Homer might make, there
is never, ever, EVER a doubt in my mind that he won’t do the right thing by episode’s
end. For all the arguments and all the
disasters and all the bad decisions on display in a five-minute slice alone,
there’s never any doubt that the family will come together. There’s no doubt that these people -- friends
and family alike -- care for one another.
There’s a level of earnestness and sincerity to these characters’
interactions that sells Springfield as a lived-in place, from 742 Evergreen
Terrace all the way to the half-shredded lemon tree just before the Shelbyville
border. In some ways, that’s where the
show’s heart lies.
The same can’t be said
about Family Guy. At all.
Whatever heart it might have had at the outset has been lost long, long
ago for the sake of the next gag. There
was a time when Peter genuinely tried to get his son back into the Boy Scouts;
now he barely even recognizes Chris as a presence…and how delightful it is to
hear Lois shut her son up just because all the good people (those voiced by
Seth MacFarlane) aren’t in the room. For
a show called Family Guy to
completely disregard its central family smacks of S-tier idiocy. That is, until you remember the overriding
principle of the show.
It always gets worse.
Earlier in this
godforsaken miniseries, I said that FG would
rather take shots at others -- actors, movies, shows, religion(s), races,
women, what have you -- than do anything with its dozens-strong cast. I stand by that. And it, and the mean-spirited nature of the
show, are proven in one
fell swoop when one random “gag” leads to Quagmire having his way with
Marge, somehow convincing her that it
wasn’t so bad (to the point where she’s practically in love with him), heads
back to Springfield for more lovin’, gets found by Homer, and then proceeds to
kill every member of the family.
Including the baby.
…You know, it’s said
that an episode of FG costs anywhere
from just under a million dollars to upwards of two million. It’s nice to know that all of that money is
going towards such a good cause, and not being wasted on things like feeding
the homeless, building houses, or finding cures for diseases.
I could talk about so
many problems with this sequence. So
many. Setting aside the fact that
Quagmire effectively raped Marge -- or the fact that the whole thing sounds like a fanfic on par with My Immortal -- there’s the fact that A) Marge ended up
veering way out of character and accepting the act because reasons, most of
which I hope aren’t related to Quagmire’s freakish giant chin-face, B) Quagmire
murdered the entire family in spite of being the one at fault, including a
baby, C) it’s the most brutal and needlessly tasteless retaliation imaginable
against a rival that’s been jovial at worst, and D) as always, it’s shock value
for shock value’s sake. No jokes. No wit.
No meaning. No nothing.
Actually, I take that
back. There is a meaning behind it. Obviously, The Simpsons is not the origin of all comedy, all quality, all
plots, and all formats. But in its
multi-decade run, it’s picked up and created its own meanings. FG’s attack
on The Simpsons is an attack on those
meanings -- a rejection of what that
show stands for, so instead the audience is more likely to (or is supposed to)
accept what this show stands
for. The
Simpsons gave us a fictional, twisted family, but it did so with the
knowledge that a comedy could be more than just a random string of gags. It could offer up something more. Something substantial. Something human, even if those proposing it
are four-fingered yellow people whose hair might be indistinguishable from the
rest of their faces. Something like, or
very near, heart.
FG doesn’t do heart. Or at
least it doesn’t anymore, because its family -- its core characters, and the
origin and proof of all the show’s ideas -- goes beyond dysfunction and
straight into madness. Whether or not
that’s a good thing is up in the air.
Nah, just kidding. It makes the show even more shit.
7) Remember Meg and Chris? They
were cool…ish.
So one day I was checking
the AV Club review of one of the latest FG
episodes, and I almost did a spit take when I read something about Meg
dying. “Meg dies? Meg actually dies?” I thought to myself.
“Like…she actually dies? For
real? As in, she’s out of the show?”
As it turns out, no,
she’s not out of the show. There’s only
the implication that she dies a year after the episode’s events, but I have my
doubts that it means anything. Which is
a shame, because if they actually did do something as bold as killing off Meg
-- seeing as how a month’s worth of episodes can go by without her even having
a line -- then maybe it’d be the shakeup
the show needs besides throwing in even more gags and hoping for the best. The old spray n’ pray. Think about it -- what, in the past several
years, have they done with her character besides just making her the garbage
can for terrible jokes?
It should go without
saying, but I don’t understand why Meg and only Meg is the sponge of everyone’s
scorn and disdain. Frankly, it comes off
as bad writing (well, worse than usual, at least); we’re told repeatedly that
Meg is disgusting, but she’s not nearly ugly enough to sell those jokes. She’s
not even ugly, all told; she’s not the thinnest character, but she’s not
exactly packing on the pounds. She’s
exactly what you’d expect a fusion of Peter and Lois to look like -- especially
since she’s pretty much a brunette Lois with a smaller nose. She came off as something of a brat in
earlier seasons, but that was only because she actually had lines. Nowadays she can barely get a line out before
someone “explains” why she’s terrible.
Either that, or Peter just says “Shut up, Meg” and leaves it at that.
Once again, FG is asking too much of its
audience. It’s just going “take our word
for it” with its jokes -- or its insults, if you prefer -- without giving a
proper setup OR a proper payoff. If Meg
really is a terrible person, then showing us why she’s terrible and why she’s
deserving of scorn is going to be infinitely more entertaining than just
shoving her aside and calling it a gag.
This isn’t astrophysics we’re talking about here; this is common sense
that even a second-grader could understand.
This show strikes me as the sort that’d botch the old “Why did the
chicken cross the road?” joke by just jumping to “To get to the other side” and
leaping to a fart joke three seconds later.
This is making my blood
pressure spike. Let’s switch to Chris.
I’ve heard the excuse
that the reason for Meg’s mistreatment is because the FG writers don’t know how to write a teenage girl. Let’s set aside the fact that that’s a
bullshit excuse that could be solved by A) getting writers that can write a
teenage girl, B) doing something with the character besides just making her a
teenage girl, given that she shares a house with a talking dog, or C) watching
old episodes of the show to mine for ideas.
Let’s say we’ll forgive them for not knowing what to do with Meg
because, hey, female characters, amirite?
If that’s the case,
then what’s their excuse with Chris?
Here’s a fun game (and
remember it for the future, because I’m probably going to use it again): if
you’re familiar with the show, describe Chris’ character and/or personality
with at least three words. Adjectives,
phrases, whatever -- just don’t say anything about how he looks. Can you come up with anything? I probably could, but not without some hard
thought. “Awkward” is one of them, I
guess. Once upon a time I would have
used “loyal to his dad”, but since the evil monkey episode I doubt that applies
anymore. “Looking for love” doesn’t work
very well -- if at all -- because the same could be said about Brian. So what’s left? Does he still do the art thing? That was a prominent part of his character,
but that hasn’t been mentioned in years.
I guess in some ways he’s “meta” or “fourth wall-breaking”, but
virtually every other character in this show does that on a whim. That’s hardly something unique to Chris.
What’s left for this
character, then? It can be said that he
at least gets a few episodes where he’s the central Griffin -- in theory at
least, before Peter swoops in to make things worse…in more ways than one. But much like Meg (even if it’s on a
different axis), the show isn’t getting nearly as much mileage as it could out
of Chris. It seems like the only truly
memorable moments where he actually matters -- outside of his “plot-centric”
episodes -- are when he points out just how absurd things have gotten for his
family.
He’s got to be one of
the only characters who’s ever genuinely called Peter out on his slide into
insanity, yet nothing substantial comes of it.
I would expect a show like FG to
be more aware of itself, and be more eager to make fun of itself with all the
tools in its toy box. I would expect a
character -- any character, but Chris especially since there’s so little done
with him -- to be something like a voice of reason, creating some kind of
contrast between the show’s manic states.
But alas, it would rather slip a flaming bag of dog crap into someone
else’s toy box.
There’s something wrong
with a show when a third of its main cast can barely get a line in an episode.
8) What the hell happened, Lois?
Hey, does anyone
remember that CBS sitcom Still Standing?
I’m not going to
pretend like it was the greatest show ever, but for what it’s worth I found it
plenty entertaining. It was -- for lack
of a better word -- quaint. It had a charm
about it. You could reliably count on it
for a few laughs, even if it’d never leave you having a good ROFL. But one of the things that I find notable
about it is that the character dynamics were a bit different from the
norm. I’d like to think that the
template for family sitcoms (or family anything) is that the father is a
bumbler, an idiot, a manchild, or any mix of the three, while the mother is the
mature, reasonable one who fixes a number of the show’s problems…with the side
effect of being a nag.
But Still Standing did things
differently. Yes, Bill Miller was still
a lazy goofball, and his wife Judy had to get on his case several times, but
there was a balance to their antics.
Judy was just as likely -- sometimes more likely -- to be the
troublemaker. She loved beer, sports,
and rock just as much as Bill did, and could be reliably persuaded to ditch her
responsibilities and screw around. She
had a real edge to her that don’t always see -- something that set her apart
from, say, Marge Simpson in her own unique and entertaining way.
Once upon a time, Lois
Griffin fell into the same slot as Marge.
A lot of the earliest episodes of FG
had Peter doing something stupid or irresponsible, Lois calling him out and
getting mad about it, Peter realizing he did something stupid and irresponsible
and admitting to it, and Lois forgiving him by episode’s end. She came off as too perfect, too noble -- a
low-rent version of Marge that didn’t add much to the show.
But somewhere along the
line, things changed. Lois got wild.
This isn’t just a
post-revival change. This is something
that’s been a part of Lois’ character and evolution from just a season or two
after the outset. Remember, this is a
character that in spite of her wealthy upbringing fell in love with a crass and
in-your-face towel boy. There was always
a beast inside her, and as time passed -- as the show found its groove -- that
beast started to awaken. Pre-revival,
she partied with people half her age in a Spring Break celebration and planned
to exact revenge on the popular kids.
Post-revival (early on, at least), she wanted Peter to give her a smack
on the ass because she’d gotten herself revved up with a simple conversation --
and just a few episodes later, discovered the thrills of shoplifting and went balls-deep into the modeling
world, to the point where she could play her ribs like a xylophone.
Lois went wild, but
there’s a VERY important distinction that needs to be made. She became a beast, but she still had her
humanity -- her reason -- built into her core.
When she went out of her way to pull a prank or party hard, she did so for the sake of her family.
When she broke the rules -- society’s, or the law in general -- she was
genuinely remorseful about it, and realized the error of her ways. She was willing to spend time in jail, simply
because it was the right thing to do.
The beast had to be caged.
But yet again, the show
went too far. Because as you know, it always gets worse.
The show hit a good
sweet spot with Lois. It made her a
voice of reason, but it gave her plenty of personality and character in spite
of (or maybe because of) her devotion to her family and understanding of social
graces. But somewhere along the line,
she became less active and more reactionary -- like she wasn’t generating the
madness around her as much as she was responding to it. An episode where she meets her insane brother
becomes more about Peter because said brother is “the fat guy strangler”. When she does get a plot to call her own, it’s
either undercut by Peter being an ass or her problems being a twisted version
of a housewife’s problems…which is to say she ends up coming off as a nag -- or
worse yet, a woman-- so that her
character overall is diminished. (It’s
worth noting that whenever Lois does get a moment to be the voice of reason,
her words are consistently turned
into white noise for an event happening in the foreground, the background, or
in the case of that Simpsons gag, at
the bottom of the screen.)
In an almost
meta-conceptual shift, Lois has actually become aware of this -- or if not
Lois, then at least the writers reacting to audience reactions/their own
bumbling -- and, for lack of a better phrase, gives up. That fire she had doesn’t exist anymore. She’s long since moved out of her sweet spot. She’s
only doing things because Peter does things (i.e. be an asshole), and if/when
she raises complaints, it’s dismissed or forgotten by episode’s end. Lois calls Peter out in the boxing episode,
and it sounds as if Peter’s learned his lesson -- but it doesn’t stick, and
come next episode he’s back to doing whatever he wants. How do you respond to that? What do you do when you know nothing you do
matters? If you’re Lois, you give
up. You stop caring about everything and
everyone.
Teenage son trying to
talk? Shut him up. Teenage daughter having problems? Suggest suicide. Infant son mistreated at daycare? Don’t even bother checking up on him. I doubt Lois is anything even close to
friends with Brian anymore, and is just someone she either tolerates or uses
for a good laugh. If you told me right
now that “Lois still loves Peter”, I just might punt a goat into the
stratosphere out of sheer rage. She’s a
bitter, shriveled-up shell of her former self…and really, can you blame her? Can you think she’s at fault for saying the
spark is gone from her marriage when her husband nearly blew her brains out
with a sniper rifle once he found out she was Jewish?
Yeah, that
happened. Because that’s what I think of
when I think “comedy”. Attempted murder.
I’ve heard that Seth
MacFarlane has actually said that if it were up to him, FG either should come to an end, or it should have ended years
ago. I’d assume that the matter is way
out of his hands now -- and locked deep in FOX’s clutches -- but he has a
point. If FG is going to continue being what it is now, and get even worse
(if that’s even remotely possible), then it should end. Let it die with some dignity, even if it is
the Sunday block’s highest-rated show.
As is, the show is pretty much the embodiment of Lois -- long since
burnt out by the increasingly-brutal antics, and left as a bitter husk because
of it.
But the show’s going to
keep going for a while yet. It has
to. Not just because FOX or the incoming
money says so; because it thinks it’s still got aces in the hole.
Let’s bring this
discussion to an end next time. I’d keep
going, but I suspect my internal organs have ruptured from the stress. Normally I wouldn’t be too worried about
that, but checking with a doctor is probably a wise idea right about now before
it gets worse.
It always gets worse.
Your review of this is getting dangerously similar to Huey Freeman's study on BET. At least you can be revitalized by the discovery channel with some quality entertainment.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X68bJ9kh1oc
On the bright side I have a 'season finale' of my I Hraet You chapters hot off the presses. I'll probably have a Epilogue Chapter sometime soon to tie off the loose strings. As long as my OCD is cool with me stopping at 9 chapters. ;)
I don't think you know just how on-the-nose you are with your comment...so let me be the first to tell you just how on-the-nose you are with this comment. Seriously, you might have stumbled onto something serious here. But that's a topic for another day.
ReplyDeleteIn any case, I'll be sure to give your IHY chapter a look -- by which I mean ALL the chapters. I've found that I'm the type that doesn't mind a good archive binge, so it'll be cool to see the progression of Lloyd from zero to slightly-above-zero all over again without having to wait for the next chapter. It'll be fun, I bet.
Anyway, I'm A-OK with the story you've offered so far, so just stop whenever you feel like you've reached a good stopping point. No worries, no stress. The last thing either of us want is something going on for as long and as poorly as a certain show which will not be named in this comment. My doctor says if I even THINK of its name, my pancreas will shoot out of my toenails.
On a related note, the FG sriters just killed off Brian and replaced him with a Sopranos dog.
ReplyDelete