So both Captain
America: Civil War and Batman v.
Superman: Dawn of Justice have made the rounds in the past few months. One of them is
great; one of them is not
so great. Still, they do represent an
important talking point: even though superhero movies have been around for a
good while now, they still have enough clout and momentum to stay
self-sustaining, at least for a while yet (and more for the Marvel camp than,
say, Fox, Warner Brothers, or Sony).
We’re bound to see more of them, obviously. There are detractors, and they have a good
point -- we’re at risk of oversaturation, for sure -- but hey. Maybe we’ll get a good Doom Patrol movie out of WB, so that my dream of seeing
Animal-Vegetable-Mineral Man on the big screen can finally be fulfilled.
That does bring up something worth discussing,
though. Obviously, the Marvel movies
(and others) have brought once-obscure characters into the spotlight, and
pretty successfully; where would Iron Man be if not for the efforts of Robert
Downey Jr. way back when? But I wonder
how many people the movies are actually converting. That is, how many people have gained enough
interest in comics thanks to the movies to actually seek out these heroes in
their natural habitat? How many people
who weren’t already down with stuff like Asgard or the Infinity Gauntlet have
even run a Google search? Are people
actually converting into true fans?
I’d imagine so, because the movies serve as
condensed introductions. But that leads
to a follow-up question: who are people choosing to follow, and why? Who’s captured their hearts and minds? Who is the best superhero?
Okay, that’s like three questions (technically
four), but whatever. It’s for a good
cause.
You know me by now, I hope. There’s no higher honor than to be called a
hero -- but since that’s a hell of a lofty plateau, sometimes we just have to
make do with creating heroes. That’s
fine with me, though. They may not
always be realistic, but as movers and shakers in fiction they’ve got every
right to defy the laws of science of reason.
It’s all in service of pushing ideas.
Concepts. Intangibles that can
teach audiences, or even inspire them to be heroic in their day-to-day
lives. Granted that show of ideals can
arise from heroes using fancy powers to beat up the baddies, but a round of
fisticuffs every now and then is easy to appreciate.
And there’s such a wide range of heroes that can
be created. We’ve seen that over the
years, across stories, mediums, cultures, and more. You’ve got cerebral heroes that use their
minds and their words to succeed. You’ve
got brawlers who fight their hardest every single day. You’ve got Boy Scouts who might as well have
“the right thing to do” tattooed onto their faces. You’ve got dark avengers that stoop to some
real lows in their pursuit of justice.
Strong guys, weak guys, cunning guys, dumb guys, gifted guys,
hard-working guys…and not even guys, in a lot of cases. We’re not wanting for superheroines either,
guys. Google is your friend.
I’m going to go ahead and guess that right now,
there are people out there at this very moment arguing about which superhero is
the best -- which is to say that someone’s having that argument at all of the moments. It’s human nature to argue about something
that, on the surface, seems so trivial.
Who’s the strongest? Who’s the
fastest? Who‘s the smartest? Who’s the richest? Who’s the bravest? Who’s the noblest? Who’s the coolest? There are so many adjectives you could apply
to these characters that we’re probably dealing with something very close to
infinity. There’s no guaranteed way we’ll
ever be able to conclusively decide who the greatest superhero ever might be,
as long as A) people have to go through decades of comics/stories, which I
doubt they’re in the mood for, and B) free will exists.
I wonder if there’s a different way to measure a
hero’s worth. Probably not on a grand scale, but I think it’d help if people
overtly defined what makes a good hero in their opinions. Is it enough at this point to say “I like
Spider-Man because I think he’s cool”, and not
launch into a pages-long treatise on why he’s the greatest hero ever
delivered to us from on high? Well,
maybe. Sometimes it’s good to be
simple. But as I’ve argued before,
thinking deeply and critically about the media you consume can only enrich your
understanding of it -- and more importantly, your appreciation.
I’m only one guy, and the best way to avoid
tripping over my feet -- and the feet of everyone else in the northern
hemisphere, while I’m at it -- is to speak for myself. I’ve said again and again that Captain
America is my favorite superhero, but why is that? Not to break kayfabe, but I wasn’t a
super-fanboy of him as soon as I learned how to tie my shoes (three years
ago). He was just kind of there, as a guy who I’d occasionally use
in video games. Maybe it was the
double-whammy of Marvel vs. Capcom 3 and
Captain America: The First Avenger that
made me a believer. Owning Captain America: Man Out of Time certainly helps, though. Boy, did I luck out by grabbing the first Cap
comic I laid eyes on.
In terms of “power levels”, Cap doesn’t have the
raw ability of someone like Superman -- so even if they’re on the same axis,
the super-soldier doesn’t have to worry about people saying “he’s so powerful
he’s boring”. Still, there’s more to a
hero than his powers, and I’d like to think that -- when he’s written or
portrayed optimally -- Cap manages to be about more than punching Nazis. My idealized version of him is that he’s a
good guy who fights for justice, BUT there’s a sense of normalcy and common
decency that keeps him grounded. Is he a
pure cinnamon bun? Yeah, kind of. Is he also forced to confront the harsh
realities of a world he’s an inherent stranger in, with his personal set of
values creating conflicts internal and external? Uhhhhhhhhhh…iunno, maybe.
So I guess if we absolutely had to pare it down to
basics -- a surefire way to decide the worth of a hero -- then maybe we could
at least start by individually, personally answering a simple question: how well does the hero sell what he or she
is about?
In the wake of Batman
v. Superman, that’s something worth thinking about at least a little
bit. Zack Snyder’s recent films starring
the big blue Boy Scout have tried to convince the world that Superman is a
symbol of hope, but (to put it mildly) haven’t done the best job of it. But it’s not an impossible task to sell an
idea via a hero or fictional character; Supergirl in the titular CBS show
managed to confirm her status as a symbol of hope (and peace, and justice, and
everything even remotely related to it) in the span of a single season -- if
not a couple of key episodes. Execution
matters; if it’s not on-point, then the end result is just a big ol’ batch of
telling, not showing.
It’s going to become more important from here
on. If the Marvel God Machine is going
to keep churning on, then we need to see each individual movie -- and each
individual hero -- put effort into differentiating them. Sell an idea, not just cool fighting or funny
jokes. Then again, it’s not just going
to be the movies that’ll need more scrutiny.
I’ll go ahead and assume that the comic book industry isn’t the
healthiest or the biggest earner right now, but the companies are still holding
it down. How? By mixing up -- or flat out remixing -- the
heroes they have on tap.
There’s been a lot of noise about Cap going from
the Star-Spangled Man to Mr. Hail Hydra.
Ms. Marvel’s solo movie is still a ways away, but we’ve long since
gotten a taste of what the heroine can offer via the Kamala Khan
incarnation. And more recently, Iron Man
is going to go from Tony “Just Put It In My Veins” Stark to a (very) young
black woman who goes to MIT and builds her own version of the famous suit. Seems a bit implausible, but whatever. I’m sure it’s good.
The important thing is that a hero might -- or
maybe should -- live or die based on the strength of his or her ideals. Likewise, it’s important that they actually
put in work to sell those ideas, whatever they may entail. I may have implied otherwise, but it doesn’t
necessarily have to be “squeaky-clean hero spewing virtue out of every
orifice”. You can have dark heroes. You can have flawed heroes. You can have weak heroes. Just do something substantial with them, and
you’ll be A-OK.
But I guess that’s dodging the real question: who is the greatest
superhero?
I don’t know.
I’m legitimately interested in finding out, even if there’s no ironclad
answer. So I suppose that’s where you
guys come in. If you know comics, the
movies, or anything in between, feel free to weigh in. Make a case for your favorite hero, and try
and win me over. Why? Because it’ll be fun!*
Also, don’t worry about Saitama being used in this
post. That means nothing, and you should
expect nothing from it. Yup. Don't worry about it at all.
*Disclaimer:
making a case for your favorite hero may not be fun.
No comments:
Post a Comment